Reactive Padding™ Test Results

Independent pressure mapping · April 2024

Nine saddles. One rider. One session.

A Zeta model recorded the lowest peak pressure in each of the two zones measured — and no conventional saddle was lower in both.

In April 2024 nine saddles were measured on a gebioMized pressure mat by an engineer and a professional bike fitter. Same rider, same road bike, same fit routine for every saddle. Every saddle bare — no covers, no shims.

The mat reports peak pressure in two places that matter: the perineal zone between the sit bones, and the sit bones themselves. A saddle can lower one by raising the other. The interesting question is what a saddle does to both.

400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Peak perineal pressure (mbar) → Peak sit-bone pressure (mbar) → lower is better Carbonia SLR Mirror Mimic Boost SMP Ultima Optima Modus −0.9° Modus −1.5°
Each point is one measured run, 12 mm chamois condition. Lower on both axes is better, so the strongest results sit toward the bottom-left. Modus appears twice because two nose angles were recorded for it; both are shown.
447

Lowest peak perineal pressure — Ultima

24% below the lowest conventional saddle in the test (Selle Italia Carbonia SLR, 589 mbar). Optima took second place at 499.

830

Lowest peak sit-bone pressure — Modus

9% below the lowest conventional saddle in the test (Specialized Power Mimic, 909 mbar).

0

Conventional saddles lower in both zones

Across all nine runs, no conventional saddle recorded lower pressure than a Zeta model in both the perineal and the sit-bone zone. Where one was lower in a zone it was markedly higher in the other — by 163 to 267 mbar in one case, by 254 to 473 mbar in the other.

0.6°

Nose angle moved Modus by 104 mbar

Dropping the nose from −0.9° to −1.5° lowered peak sit-bone pressure from 934 to 830 on the same saddle, same rider, same session. Setup is not a detail.

That trade-off shows up cleanly in the conventional saddles. The one with the lowest perineal pressure recorded the third-highest sit-bone pressure. The one with the lowest sit-bone pressure recorded the third-highest perineal pressure. Relief in one zone came from load moving to the other. The table below is sorted so you can check it yourself.

SaddlePerinealSit bone LSit bone RSit bone peak
Zeta Ultima447915961961
Zeta Optima499753988988
Selle Italia Carbonia SLR58978510971097
Zeta Modus · −0.9°666795934934
Zeta Modus · −1.5°678667830830
Specialized Mirror70372610841084
Specialized Power Mimic920909879909
Selle Italia Boost92291614351435
Selle SMP119472412521252

All figures are peak pressure in millibar, 12 mm chamois condition. Sorted by perineal pressure, lowest first.

How the test was run

  • gebioMized pressure mapping, 3 April 2024, one continuous session.
  • One rider throughout. One road bike. The fitter set each saddle's position for that saddle rather than copying one position across all of them.
  • Every saddle measured bare. No seat covers, no aftermarket padding.
  • Every saddle was run twice — once in a 3 mm chamois and once in a 12 mm chamois. All nine measured lower with the thicker chamois, so the two conditions rank saddles the same way. The figures above are the 12 mm condition; mixing the two would not be valid.
  • Where left and right sit-bone readings differ, the table reports the higher of the two. Several saddles are markedly asymmetric and taking the worse side is the conservative choice.
  • Two nose angles were recorded for the Modus and both are published. The other saddles have a single recorded run each.
  • This was the second of two pressure-mapping sessions run by the same engineer. The first produced results consistent in direction with these. That session included saddles whose data we are not free to publish, so this page reports the April 2024 session on its own.

Who ran it, and who paid for it

The session was conducted by Eugene Bernosky, engineer, and Justin Lucke, professional bike fitter. Neither holds any financial interest in Zeta Saddles. Neither was given direction on protocol, saddle selection, or how results were reported.

Mr Bernosky approached Zeta to propose the test and was not paid for it. Zeta paid Mr Lucke's standard session fee.

We state that plainly because a brand paying for its own testing is ordinary, and not saying so is not.